Skip to content

Correct the range of timestamp 96#301

Closed
tagomoris wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
tagomoris-patch-2
Closed

Correct the range of timestamp 96#301
tagomoris wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
tagomoris-patch-2

Conversation

@tagomoris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@clwi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

clwi commented Mar 16, 2021

Is it by intention that Timestamp 64 has nanoseconds specified in the upper limit and the other don't, or is it by accident?

@tagomoris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

What does "the other" mean? For Timestamp 64, both the upper and the lower have nanoseconds.

Timestamp 64 format can represent a timestamp in [1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 UTC, 2514-05-30 01:53:04.000000000 UTC) range.

If it means Timestamp 96, yes, it's probably intentional... but adding nanoseconds makes sense to me.

@tagomoris
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I made a mistake about the allowed max seconds of signed 64-bit int. See #263

@tagomoris tagomoris closed this Mar 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants