Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-06
review-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-06-opsdir-lc-wu-2022-05-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2022-04-29
Requested 2022-04-15
Authors Randy Bush , Rob Austein , Tom Harrison
I-D last updated 2026-03-02 (Latest revision 2026-03-02)
Completed reviews Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -06 by Mohamed Boucadair (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Bo Wu (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Bo Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Bo Wu
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/-XBQ0FS7VShg2VcQydTU7KoA_M8
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 25)
Result Has nits
Completed 2022-05-01
review-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-06-opsdir-lc-wu-2022-05-01-00
Hi all,

 I have been selected as the Operational Directorate reviewer for this
 draft.

Review summary:
I believe this document is "Ready with nits". And it would be better
readability if the draft had added the reason for "obsolete" rather than
"update".

comments below:

This draft obsoletes RFC8210 and section 1.2 list the following changes:
1, new sections 5.12 ASPA PDU type
2, section 11 two ROA PDU race conditions
3, The protocol version number incremented  from 1 (one) to 2 (two)
4, the Section 7 has been updated accordingly

suggestions:
- Adds the reason why choosing "obsolete" RFC 8210 instead of "update", since
the protocol version has been updated from 1 to 2 - The title "Protocol Version
Negotiation" to be added to section 7 description. -  Some major changes to
other sections to be added:
   5.1 Flags adds ASPA PDU specific processing
   5.8. End of Data adds clarification text on version 1 changes
   14. IANA Considerations