RFC 2154, "OSPF with Digital Signatures", June 1997

Source of RFC: Legacy

Errata-ID: 2081

Status:
Verified
Type:
Editorial
Reported By:
Vishwas Manral
Date Reported:
2010-03-19
Verified by:
Ross Callon
Date Verified:
2010-03-19

Section 5 says:

Because of these properties of OSFP routing, an AS can
   contain signed and unsigned areas, and achieve a predictable level of
   authentication.

It should say:

Because of these properties of OSPF routing, an AS can
   contain signed and unsigned areas, and achieve a predictable level of
   authentication.

Notes:

s/OSFP/OSPF