RFC 2154, "OSPF with Digital Signatures", June 1997
Source of RFC: Legacy
Errata-ID: 2081
- Status:
- Verified
- Type:
- Editorial
- Reported By:
- Vishwas Manral
- Date Reported:
- 2010-03-19
- Verified by:
- Ross Callon
- Date Verified:
- 2010-03-19
Section 5 says:
Because of these properties of OSFP routing, an AS can
contain signed and unsigned areas, and achieve a predictable level of
authentication.
It should say:
Because of these properties of OSPF routing, an AS can
contain signed and unsigned areas, and achieve a predictable level of
authentication.
Notes:
s/OSFP/OSPF